A list of editorial changes since the Candidate Recommendation drafts is below:
- 4318 - Aligned examples with the latest version of the WS-SecurityPolicy specification.
- 4374 - Aligned examples with the latest version of the WS-Addressing Metadata specification.
- 4379 - Added a clarification note that C14N 1.1 is intended to address the issues that occur with Canonical XML 1.0 in regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security Maintenance WG has been chartered to address how to integrate C14n 1.1 with XML Security.
- 4389 - Aligned the UDDI names and keys with the XML namespace name of the Web Services Policy language.
- 4391 - Updated references to reference the latest UDDI specifications.
- 4394 - Closed with no action. Answered a question from the commentator regarding what is the type of WSDL 20 {policy} property.
- 4477 - Fixed a line number.
- 4478 - Fixed a line number.
- 4479 - Added an example to illustrate the note in Section 3.2, Framework.
- 4544 - Clarified the meaning of a policy intersection result.
- 4552 - Clarified the term collection.
- 4553 - Clarified the phrase, "all of the assertions in both alternatives".
- 4554 - Clarified that policy intersection is optional.
- 4555 - Added a clarification note that while policy intersection at times is analogous with set intersection, policy intersection does not imply formal set intersection semantics.
- 4556 - Fixed an editorial issue in Section 4.3.3, Framework.
- 4558 - Closed with no action and marked for future considerations.
- 4561 - Clarified that if a domain were to leverage the policy intersection in the framework and specify domain specific intersection rules, the domain could only specify intersection rules for assertion parameters.
- 4577 - Added an example to illustrate the non-intersection case.
- 4579 - Clarified the relationship between an assertion and its nested policy expression, if any.
- 4580 - Duplicate of 4579.
- 4583 - Clarified how to interpret multiple assertions of the same type if policy assertion authors did not specify the semantics of multiple policy assertions of a simple assertion type (that does not allow parameters and nested policy expression).
- 4584 - Clarified the behavior implied by an ignorable assertion.
- 4592 - Fixed an incorrect reference.
- 4598 - Clarified the distributive rule and added an example to illustrate the case where a combination of Optional=false and Distributive rules apply.
- 4672 - Fixed typos in two examples in the Framework draft.
